Is SAFe Just Waterfall Wearing a Hoodie?

Is SAFe Just Waterfall Wearing a Hoodie?

SAFe gives leaders a comforting sense of order: roles, layers, roadmaps, and predictable increments. But too often, that “safety” hides something familiar – Waterfall dressed up with agile terminology.

On paper, SAFe promises agility at scale. In practice, it often turns into months-long planning cycles, extra layers of governance, and top-down control with new names. The labels change – “epics” instead of projects, “program increments” instead of deadlines – but the behaviors stay the same.

Which brings us to the real question: Is SAFe actually helping companies become agile, or is it just Waterfall in disguise?

Read More
The Scalability Trap: How Premature Technical Excellence Kills the Product

The Scalability Trap: How Premature Technical Excellence Kills the Product

The “Build it right the first time” mantra has sunk more startups than bad code ever did.

I’ve seen it firsthand: One developer built his own message broker in PHP because ActiveMQ “didn’t fit his needs.” Another rebuilt Ansible in Perl to provision VMs. And the wildest one? Someone started designing a version control system on top of Elasticsearch because Git was “inefficient.”

These weren’t feats of brilliance. They were ego-driven distractions that added fragility, wasted money, and created zero customer value. And they all happened because leadership failed to ask the only question that matters: “How does this help the user?”

Read More